Burning up significant water cooler time has been the New York Review of Books article, “Reflections from a Hashtag”. There’s been much discussion – public and private – with serious criticism lobbed against the author and the editor.
Select articles on the matter:
- Want to see the article fact-checked by the Toronto Star journalist who broke the original story? Click here.
- Want to read The Atlantic article that discusses how the editor, by publishing the article and defending himself, revealed how out of touch he was with the current cultural climate? Click here.
- Want to read the Slate interview with the editor? Click here. It’s a doozy.
- Want to read the Vrij Nederland interview with the editor? Click here. The editor confirm he was not fired.
So. Many. Issues. The situation resurfaced dialogue on the author’s acquittal and the associated footnotes. Some noted that the article was poorly written and didn’t uphold the standards expected of the NYRB. The trigger for me was how, once again, the narrative of our universe was curated in the vein of history is written by the victors.
#WhyIDidntReport New perspectives and new voices seemed to have been the editor’s objective in the upcoming thematic “The Fall of Men”, but it actually fell quite short by giving a platform to someone of questionable nature with an underlying motive to redeem himself. To me, it felt the author was presenting his multi-page resume to a US immigration officer in hopes of an O-visa, basically saying, “I’m so extraordinarily accomplished that I simply can’t be the bad guy.” Wolf in sheep’s clothing with the fresh take still missing.
When it comes to a 360° narrative, victims underreport. It’s part of the complexity of human psychosis. It plays into what is considered “truth” and shapes the paradigm we view the world. We now know the author’s history, but what of the victims?
It’s not clear what brought editor to author, but in a parallel universe, I envision the editor also reaching out to an alleged victim and this new Author 2 finding the courage within to bring a new voice to the table. I won’t go so far as saying Author 1 shouldn’t have been published, but I think the lack of context on the contents of the article made him an unreliable “subject matter expert”.
From Tone Deaf to Pitch Perfect So, what now? The print edition will be out soon and likely fly off the shelves. The NYRB will allocate more pages for “Letters to the Editor” in the next edition. The majority can continue blindly clicking through to the next hullabaloo playing out in public view.
For me, my homework is to listen to new voices and perspectives. If you’re interested, see the link to my new subscribe below, plus other podcasts I’m into.
LEFT, RIGHT AND CENTER: Because I gotta start somewhere.
—
2 DOPE QUEENS: Started listening to this because of a friend. She knows who she is. PRO-TIP: She listens to podcasts while grocery shopping. Genius.
CANADALAND: It’s funny and independent.
THE DAVE CHANG SHOW: Chef Christina Tosi was on this week! Who EVER, ever, EVER has a female chef as a guest?
REVISIONIST HISTORY: Sometimes I feel like I’ve outgrown Gladwell’s ability to mainstream, but I do enjoy this fresh take on old news.
***YouTube bonus*** THE LAW TWINZ: I can’t get enough of their music video reactions. My first foray into their world was Childish Gambino’s “This is America”. Watched it again just now and 2m08s still gets me shook.

You must be logged in to post a comment.